Critical information found in public examination

A best practice approach to using eDiscovery to find critical information during a public examination.

Decorative pattern

A case study in the best practice approach using eDiscovery to finding critical information during a public examination.

Finding the Evidence

eDiscovery Collab was engaged to establish the document database for an insolvency investigation.

Over 500,000 documents were collected. We were able to reduce that to 70,000 documents by deduplicating and removing the junk.

During the public examination of one of the directors a chain of enquiry emerged about the authenticity of a particular document which was used to attract investors. The issue was whether the document was prepared by the company or if it had been copied from another source and just had the names changed. The oral evidence of the director was that the document was legitimate.

Could evidence be found and put to the witness that showed the document had in fact been copied from another source?

eDiscovery Collab used its database and searching skills, combined with its general understanding of documents and how they are edited, to show that it was in fact copied from another source.

This was achieved using search functions which revealed that the person editing the document had missed one of the name changes they had needed to make. The mistake was in very small font and unlikely to be found by a human eye search, and especially not quickly.

This led to the team presenting to the director on the stand, direct evidence that the document had been copied and manually edited.

This all occurred within the space of a day with live support by eDiscovery Collab to the insolvency team during the public examination.

Benefits of Applying eDiscovery Technology

The volume of data and time constraints make it almost impossible to find such evidence using a manual approach.

The search functionality in this case enabled us to find very small differences between documents, the kind which are unlikely to be picked up by a human review.

On an ongoing basis, the database is now enabling the insolvency team to track cash in and out of the company more effectively by finding the related emails, potentially saving thousands in bank tracing enquiries and providing superior evidentiary records of what the business’s money was being spent on.

Over time the insolvency team is becoming very efficient at using the document database themselves to further their investigation.

The database has enabled this insolvency team to find corroborating evidence fast and strengthen their methodology and opinions.

Team members who worked on this matter

Kate Clark

Kate Clark

CEO

Kate is a senior eDiscovery expert with over 30 years of experience dedicated to simplifying complex legal data and streamlining operations for lawyers.

  • social icon
  • social icon
  • social icon
View full profile
Kimberly Tsoi

Kimberly Tsoi

Senior consultant

An eDiscovery extraordinaire who has significant experience working with Relativity, Nuix, Brainspace and Everlaw, Kimberley is client and solution focused.

  • social icon
  • social icon
  • social icon
View full profile

Signup to our newsletter